We characterize pension systems along three dimensions: 1) actuarial vs. non-actuarial, 2) funded vs. pay-as-you-go, 3) defined-contribution vs. defined-benefit. Increasing the degree of actuarial fairness, by strengthening the linkage between contributions and benefits, reduces labor market distortions and may increase welfare in a Pareto-efficiency sense. Increasing the degree of funding implies mainly a redistribution of income among generations, although a partial shift to funding also provides better risk-return combinations for individuals. Shifting from defined-benefit to defined-contribution schemes (with fixed contribution rates) shifts the income risk from workers and taxpayers to pensioners.
Working Paper No. 580
The Gains from Pension Reform
Working Paper
Referens
Lindbeck, Assar och Mats Persson (2002). ”The Gains from Pension Reform”. IFN Working Paper nr 580. Stockholm: Institutet för Näringslivsforskning.
Lindbeck, Assar och Mats Persson (2002). ”The Gains from Pension Reform”. IFN Working Paper nr 580. Stockholm: Institutet för Näringslivsforskning.
Författare
Assar Lindbeck, Mats Persson