Denna webbplats lagrar cookies i begränsad omfattning. Genom att besöka sidan, godkänner du villkoren i vår integritetspolicy. Läs mer

The Political Economy of Antitrust

A Consumer Surplus Defense in Merger Control

Bokkapitel
Referens
Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof (2007). ”A Consumer Surplus Defense in Merger Control”. I Vivek Ghosal och Johan Stennek (red.), The Political Economy of Antitrust (287–302). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(06)82011-0

Författare
Sven-Olof Fridolfsson

Redaktör
Vivek Ghosal, Johan Stennek

A government wanting to promote an efficient allocation of resources as measured by the total surplus, should strategically delegate to its competition authority a welfare standard with a bias in favor of consumers. A consumer bias means that some welfare increasing mergers will be blocked. This is optimal, if the relevant alternative to the merger is another change in market structure that will even further increase the total surplus. Furthermore, a consumer bias is shown to enhance welfare even though it blocks some welfare increasing mergers when the relevant alternative is the status quo.