This Website has a limited use of cookies. By using this website, you are agreeing to the terms and conditions listed in our data protection policy. Read more

Avid debate on wage regulation

13 June 2019

On Thursday, the new book Kollektivavtal och lönenormering i en ny tid (Dialogos 2019) was presented at a seminar in Stockholm. It is authored by Lars Calmfors, Simon Ek, Ann-Sofie Kolm, and Per Skedinger. They have studied and analyzed how the Swedish collective bargaining model can be reformed so that greater consideration is given to the lack of qualified labor, such as nurses, and the economy at large. During the seminar and occasionally intense debate, also participated Stefan Koskinen, Almega (Employers’ Organisation for the Swedish Service Sector), Marie Nilsson, Union IF Metall, and Annelie Söderberg, Vårdförbundet (Swedish Association of Health Professionals). Journalist Anna Danielsson Öberg moderated the seminar.

From left you can see: Anna Danielsson Öberg, moderator, Per Skedinger, IFN, Annelie Söderberg, Vårdförbundet (Swedish Association of Health Professionals), Marie Nilsson, IF Metall, Stefan Koskinen, Almega (Employers’ Organisation for the Swedish Service.

 

 

Lars Calmfors and Per Skedinger were interviewed by journalist Anna Danielsson Öberg about their new book. Photo: Bosse Johansson.

"Wage formation has always been seen as a problem for employment. And this is the case also today. Though, today the problem reads mainly low-educated and foreign-born," said Lars Calmfors at the seminar.

"It's a question about the basic conditions in the labor market. My members are the first in unemployment if the system fails. Therefore it is not possible to experiment and hope for the best," said Marie Nilsson, IF Metall, when a changed norm for wage setting was discussed.

She said that the Industry Agreement (Industriavtalet) creates stability and real wage increases for everyone.


Annelie Söderberg and Marie Nilsson. Photo: Bosse Johansson.

Also, Stefan Koskinen, Almega, praised today's model: "If you have a model that has been beneficial for employees, entrepreneurs, and the country at large, you should be careful when deciding to change it."


Marie Nilsson and Stefan Koskinen. Photo: Bosse Johansson.

Koskinen explained that we have to find ways to develop and modernize the collective agreements if we want to have our Swedish model also in the future, "which has so far served us well". Annelie Söderberg, the Swedish Association of Health Professionals, was not entirely positive to this stance. The entry salaries of the members of my union have admittedly increased, she said, but there have been hardly any increases in wages at all later in their careers.

"We cannot allow a lack of wage increases to affect the quality of care, and unfortunately, this is what happens today," said Söderberg.


Lars Calmfors and Annelie Söderberg. Photo: Bosse Johansson.

When the discussion was about whether the system in general needs to be reformed, Lars Calmfors  said that "whichever risk is greatest: Is it changing the wage system or is it changing the system?"


It was a knowledgeable audience that attended the seminar at Medelhavsmuseet in Stockholm. Photo: Bosse Johansson.

Lars Calmfors suggested that a possible reform of the wage regulation is "that there should be an independent 'imbalance committee' appointed by the unions and the employers' organizations that can provide advice on major imbalances in the market." Several questions from the audience picked up on the imbalance committee and how it would function without creating major tensions in the labor market.