It is well known that communication often serves as a facilitator for cooperation in static games. Yet, communication can serve entirely different purposes in dynamic settings as communication during the game may work as a means for renegotiation, potentially undermining the credibility of cooperative strategies. To explore this issue, this paper experimentally investigates cooperation and non-binding communication in a two-stage game. More specifically, two treatments are considered: one with only pre-play communication and one where subjects can also communicate intra-play between the stages of the game. The results highlight a nontrivial difference concerning the effects of pre-play communication between the two treatments. Pre-play communication only has a significant impact on cooperation when no intra-play communication is possible. The results suggest that the credibility of pre-play messages may depend crucially on future communication opportunities.
Working Paper No. 883
Credible Communication and Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Multi-stage Games
Working Paper
Reference
Andersson, Ola and Erik Wengström (2011). “Credible Communication and Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Multi-stage Games ”. IFN Working Paper No. 883. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).
Andersson, Ola and Erik Wengström (2011). “Credible Communication and Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Multi-stage Games ”. IFN Working Paper No. 883. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN).
Authors
Ola Andersson, Erik Wengström